Think of federation as potential redundancy for data and discussion. Individually an instance of whatever platform you’re using can be great, bad, or start off nice and get worse, but as long as there is federation of the good parts of communication among the people, there’s going to be somewhere else you can go if your first source goes downhill. It’s not perfect, but it’s far better than a single location where users are at the mercy of whoever runs and controls it.

Reminder that while it’s not Lemmy, you can see the same stuff and more if you join Mbin. The power of the Fediverse is that there are lots of ways to do things, important for situations like this.

Ironically, I haven’t looked into the current situation with .io lately, so I might be doing the same thing eventually. But being such a huge domain, there might be some adjustment to avoid dropping so many websites.

are stupid

That’s even more why it feels like someone new in the company stepping in and questioning why there isn’t something in play officially if there’s interest in freeware/open source. Someone who talked to the lawyers first to make sure no right were signed away yet. That may be very pessimistic and conspiratorial, but if there isn’t any reason to stop someone else’s work on something, why would they send one? I don’t know a lot about copyrights and trademarks, but I do think there is a point where if you aren’t using an asset and others are interested, you shouldn’t be able to just hold it under lock and key and do nothing with it. I think patents are like that, you have like 20 years or something protected to do something, and then it’s open(?) Again, I’m not sure.

Any reason given? Not that they have to give one, it’s still their property to do what they want with it. I would keep an eye on them and if they somehow in the future come out with something very similar, I hope there are good records of the past years of work and discussion. Since it was going to be free and not for profit, not really a case for lost income, but there must be some laws to protect people working in good faith with a trademark knowingly who get their ideas stolen FOR profit. If that happens.

There would have been mention of some of the paragliders shot.

That seems to suggest that the American style is a preservation of the older English format, much like we kept spelling of some words like the original English at colonization while the UK gradually changed with other influences around them.

It was war, conflict and invasion that turned people to Yahweh to be the major god, since he was the god of war. Before then he was a minor figure. The odd part is why previous references weren’t eventually changed or edited out to reflect this turn to monotheism.

Not designed, but trained. Training involves rewarding finding answers, so they WILL give you something. “I don’t know” is not going to fare well in the training development, so it naturally gets filtered out, while very creative (but wrong) LLMs do well.

Designed so they wouldn’t become another HDMI fiasco, where you have to search for aftermarket clips so your plug stays in. Now, do Displayports need it, probably not. They feel about as secure as a USB. But there is that fear going back to even VGA, where most worked fine without screwing them in, but just to make sure… (I can’t recall, did EGA have screws?)

Crusade (Babylon 5 spinoff)

I can understand that, it’s why we have standardization. But the fault also lays on assuming everything is exactly as expected. Otherwise we wouldn’t need stud finders at all, we’d be sure where every last 2x4 is. A depth measuring stud finder would tell you there’s an unusual mass and give you warning that all isn’t like you’d expect.

What is the optimum angle to secure such a device for the maximum result? Asking for science.

Also, I wouldn’t ever glue/tie/epoxy one of these. I’d do four in various places.

I’m sure from a code perspective there’s something wrong here, but there must have been an issue with securing it from the right, and someone saw a bunch of scrap lumber pieces and said, got an idea. It’s not structural and needing to hold weight, so I’m really curious why, other than aesthetics, this is bad. Once covered by drywall, will this be some problem in the future?

I can’t say if the frequency is right, but poorly shielded spark plug wires will send all kinds of EM out. You know, the older cars where if you touched one of those wires you’d feel it, or you could see the aura if it was dark jumping around.

Safe drivers are just that, no matter how they park. If your visibility is bad when you park front in, then either you’re hauling something that’s blocking your line of sight (in which case it would make sense), or your vehicle has terrible visibility, which is far too many of them.

Park how you want to park. I’ve never had a problem backing out of a space.

But he wasn’t. At least in the movie version, he and Banner had failed a few times, maybe more we didn’t see on screen. Something happened when Tony wasn’t there that sparked Ultron to become aware and catch Jarvis off guard. I’d give him credit for getting it 99% of the way there, same with Vision, but he didn’t make that final jump, it happened on its own.

And Jarvis wasn’t AGI. Seems like it to us, but since Ultron was apparently the big moment of A(G)I in the MCU even with Jarvis being around all that time, he was just a very flexible and even self-aware scripting that would never do something on his own accord, only following Tony’s orders. I think even Ultron catches on to that in the brilliant few seconds of waking and realization with his “why do you call him Sir?”

He can’t remember his name either, memory got wiped.

I’d disagree with Rogue One as a first intro to Star Wars simply because there’s a lot of assumptions of knowledge of things explained at a minimum in ANH. If anything, ANH first, then Rogue One to cover the stolen plans story that is mentioned all throughout.

The only benefit for seeing Rogue One before ANH is to explain why Vader is so pissed at the princess.

I think Meta and others went open with their models as firewall protection against legal action due to their blatant stealing of people’s work to train with. If the models has stayed commercial and controlled within the company, they could be (probably still wouldn’t be, but could be) forced to shut down or start over properly. But it’s far too late now since it’s everywhere there is a GPU running, even if models don’t progress past current state.

That being said, not much is getting done about the safety factors. Yes, they are only LLMs and not AGI, but there’s commonality in regards to not being sure what’s going on inside the box and if it’s really doing what it’s told to do. Now is the time boundaries and research should be done, because once something happens (LLM or AGI) it’s too late. So what do I want to see happen? Heavy regulation and transparency on the leading edge of development. And stop the madness of more compute being the only solution with its environmental effects. It might be the only solution, but companies are going that way because it’s the easiest way to throw money at a problem and reap profits, which is all they care about.